Neglect, in its various forms, is a recurring and significant theme identified across the majority of reviews overseen by the Review Advisory Group. Working Together to Safeguard Children defines neglect as the persistent failure to meet a child’s basic physical and/or psychological needs, which is likely to result in the serious impairment of the child’s health or development.
In all Child Safeguarding Practice Reviews commissioned by the Local Safeguarding Children Partnership (LSCP), neglect has been consistently identified as a key underlying factor. This pattern is mirrored within Rapid Reviews, highlighting neglect as a critical area requiring continued multi-agency focus.
Early indicators of chronic neglect
Early indicators of neglect were evident in the majority of cases reviewed. Analysis of case chronologies demonstrated that signs of unmet basic needs were present at an early stage. However, as these indicators did not present as an immediate crisis, they were frequently minimised or not responded to with sufficient urgency.
Common features included poor home conditions and concerns regarding children’s hygiene and presentation. Over time, this resulted in children experiencing chronic neglect without effective intervention. It was noted that the use of chronologies in planning and assessments was not effectively used meaning that a picture of a child or family’s needs over time were not considered. Agencies should review how they record, analyse and share information to build a better picture of safeguarding concerns over time rather than responding or reacting to single incidents.
Neglect of children’s health needs
Reviews frequently identified neglect in relation to children’s health needs. Many children had identified medical conditions that were not adequately addressed due to missed appointments and a lack of parental engagement. It was noted that professionals did not always follow up appropriately when children were not brought to appointments, often resulting in the child being discharged from services. In several cases, the Was Not Brought (WNB) policy was either not applied or not applied robustly, leading to missed opportunities for safeguarding intervention.
Educational neglect
Statutory guidance defines educational neglect as the persistent failure of a parent or carer to ensure a child receives suitable full-time education, resulting in significant impairment to the child’s development, health, or wellbeing. Within reviews, children were frequently described as ‘not in education’ or noted to have persistently poor attendance. However, there was limited explicit use of the term educational neglect.
The underlying causes of educational neglect were often complex, including parental inability or unwillingness to ensure school attendance, delays in assessing children, and difficulties accessing appropriate educational provision for children with additional needs. This lack of clarity and challenge around educational neglect contributed to delayed or ineffective responses.
Further information
Our Safeguarding Topics page on neglect brings together key information, guidance and resources to support practitioners in recognising, responding to and reducing the impact of neglect.
The Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel's Hub consolidates learning and insights from child safeguarding reviews to support stronger practice for children.